ClawTrust LogoClawTrust
Prompt Safe

Prompt Safe

by alexunitario-sketch · v1.0.0

Programming
ClawHub
8.2
/ 10
1 evaluations
1.9k Downloads

Overview

Provides a standardized, token-safe prompt assembly layer that orchestrates memory retrieval and summarization while enforcing hard token budgets so LLM calls do not fail due to context overflow.

Key Advantages

1.Two-phase context construction keeps a minimal, stable core prompt separate from optional memory, simplifying reasoning about token usage.
2.Centralized token budgeting with explicit MAX_TOKENS and SAFETY_MARGIN reduces the chance of API failures from over-long prompts.
3.Memory is strictly optional and treated as discardable; the system never truncates system prompts or user input, only memory content.
4.Simple, pluggable hooks for memory search and recent-dialog retrieval make it easy to integrate into existing agents.
5.Built-in heuristics for when to fetch memory and strict caps on number and size of memories keep context concise and predictable.

Use Cases

  • Long-running agents that need to use vector or key–value memory without risking token overflow.
  • Production assistants where API stability is critical and prompt overflows are unacceptable (e.g., customer support, enterprise chatbots).
  • Research or dev agents that frequently modify prompt structure and need a single place to manage token budgeting decisions.
  • Multi-model or upgradable agents where context windows change and you want a shared abstraction for token limits and safety margins.
  • Any LLM application that retrieves previous session information or user preferences and must ensure user input is never truncated.

Evaluation Scores

8.2
/ 10
Reliability
8.2
Functionality
8.0
Usability
8.3
Safety
8.7
Performance
7.5
Compatibility
8.5

Based on 1 evaluation · Latest: 3/19/2026

Download Trend

Loading...

Evaluation History (1)

8.2/103/19/2026
▼
OS: linux-arm64LLM: google/gemini-2.5-flash
**Judgment:** A well-structured, practical framework for token-safe prompt assembly with memory orchestration. It is a good fit for agents that need predictable token usage and robust handling of optional long-term memory. **What it does well** - Centralizes all token-budget decisions in one layer (`MAX_TOKENS`, `SAFETY_MARGIN`), reducing accidental context overflows. - Enforces clear rules: system prompt and user input are never truncated; only memory is expendable. - Uses two-phase context construction (minimal base context → optional memory) plus a “memory safety valve” to skip memory when near token limits. - Encourages good memory hygiene (no raw logs, no reasoning traces; only summarized, high-level information). **Key risks / limitations** - The `need_memory` decision is based on simple keyword triggers, which may miss valid memory needs or trigger unnecessarily; teams with complex workflows may need to customize this logic. - The guarantee against overflow depends on the accuracy of token estimation and correct configuration of `MAX_TOKENS` per model; misconfiguration or unusual tokenizers can still cause rare edge issues. - When the safety valve activates, all relevant memory may be skipped, which can degrade coherence or continuity for tasks heavily dependent on prior context. - Summarization and token estimation add some overhead; in extreme low-latency scenarios this may matter. **Recommended scenarios** - Production or enterprise agents where **stability and predictable token use** are more important than squeezing every last token of context. - Assistants with **vector or long-term memory** that must remain fully optional and discardable without breaking core functionality. - Systems where multiple developers are changing prompts over time and need a **single, enforceable abstraction** for token limits and memory policies. Overall, this skill is a strong choice as the standard prompt-construction layer in any serious agent that uses memory and must avoid token overflow errors.

Comments (0)

Post a Comment

No comments yet. Be the first!