2.5k Downloads
Overview
Command-line academic search and retrieval hub that queries multiple scholarly databases (arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, limited Google Scholar), downloads PDFs, and exports citations/metadata in various formats to support research workflows.
Key Advantages
1.Multi-source academic search (arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, limited Google Scholar) from a single, consistent interface.
2.Rich output options including text, JSON, BibTeX, RIS, and Markdown for integration with LaTeX, reference managers, and scripts.
3.End-to-end support for research workflows: searching, filtering, downloading PDFs, extracting citations, and generating bibliographies.
4.Powerful filtering and sorting (by year, date range, author, citation count, relevance/date/citations) to refine literature searches.
5.Good documentation with many concrete, copy-pasteable examples and recommended workflows for literature reviews, recent papers, and author tracking.
Cross-platform Python + OpenClawCLI setup with best
Use Cases
- Running a literature review on a given topic by querying arXiv and Semantic Scholar, exporting results to JSON, and generating a BibTeX bibliography.
- Tracking recent developments in a field (e.g., large language models or gene therapy) using date filters and saving Markdown summaries.
- Building a local reference library by downloading PDFs for a topic and generating structured citation files (BibTeX/RIS) for use in LaTeX or Zotero/Mendeley.
- Identifying highly cited or influential papers in a domain by querying Semantic Scholar with citation thresholds and sorting by citations.
- Retrieving a specific researcher’s publication history across sources (e.g., arXiv and Semantic Scholar) filtered and sorted by date for CV or survey work.
Evaluation Scores
8.2
/ 10
Reliability
7.7
Functionality
8.8
Usability
8.5
Safety
8.0
Performance
7.8
Compatibility
8.2
Based on 1 evaluation · Latest: 3/19/2026
Download Trend
Loading...
Evaluation History (1)
8.2/103/19/2026▼
OS: linux-x64LLM: anthropic/claude-opus-4.6
**Judgement:** A strong, well-documented academic search and citation hub, best suited for users comfortable with the command line and Python environments. It offers broad coverage (arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar), rich filtering, and flexible export formats that make it valuable for serious research workflows and automation.
**Strengths:**
- Covers multiple major scholarly sources with a unified interface.
- Handles search, filtering, PDF download, metadata retrieval, and citation export (BibTeX, RIS, JSON, Markdown).
- Documentation is extensive, with concrete examples and end-to-end workflows (literature review, tracking recent research, building reference libraries).
**Key Risks / Limitations:**
- Requires OpenClawCLI and several Python packages; installation and dependency management may be challenging for non-technical users.
- Relies on external APIs/services (arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar), so network issues, rate limits, or API changes can impact reliability and performance.
- Access to some PDFs is constrained by paywalls or institutional access; the tool cannot bypass copyright or licensing restrictions.
- Google Scholar integration is explicitly limited and may not match the results from its web interface.
**Recommended Scenarios:**
- Graduate students, researchers, and power users who routinely run literature reviews and manage citations.
- Automated or scripted research pipelines that need structured data (JSON/BibTeX/RIS) from multiple academic sources.
- Users who want to systematically download and organize topic-specific paper collections and associated bibliography files.
**Not Ideal For:**
- Users uncomfortable with the command line or Python environment setup.
- Situations requiring guaranteed access to paywalled full texts or perfectly comprehensive coverage of all scholarly databases.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!