ClawTrust LogoClawTrust
PredictMe - AI Trading Agent

PredictMe - AI Trading Agent

by howardpen9 · v1.0.0

Marketing
ClawHub
7.8
/ 10
1 evaluations
3.2k Downloads

Overview

Enables an OpenClaw agent to act as a short‑horizon crypto prediction trader on PredictMe, handling registration, credential management, real‑time odds retrieval, bet placement, and trading discipline around 10‑second BTC/ETH/SOL prediction rounds (primarily on TEST balance).

Key Advantages

1.Rich, opinionated trading framework with clear phases (observe, paper trade, small size, scale up) rather than naive auto‑betting.
2.Well‑documented API usage and workflows: registration, credential storage, odds/balance/bets endpoints, and nonce management are all spelled out.
3.Built‑in bankroll management rules (percentage‑of‑balance sizing, ranges by account size, survival rules under low balance).
4.Explicit decision framework for each trade: timing vs lock period, expected value calculation, confidence tiers, and session stop conditions.
5.Support for owner preferences (risk tolerance, max bet percent, schedule, stop‑loss, profit target, strategy style) including conservative defaults and an approval mode for early rounds. - Designed to

Use Cases

  • Building an experimental OpenClaw trading agent that trades PredictMe’s 10‑second BTC/ETH/SOL prediction markets using a structured momentum/EV framework on TEST balance.
  • Researching and iterating on micro‑timeframe trading strategies (momentum, contrarian, conservative value, grid spread) with clear hooks to plug in custom probability models.
  • Creating teaching or demo agents that showcase disciplined risk management, bankroll rules, and data‑driven evaluation of trading performance via the /bets history API.
  • Running controlled trading sessions that obey owner‑specified schedules, stop‑loss/profit targets, and optional per‑trade human approval for higher safety or early‑stage oversight.
  • Analyzing historical agent performance across odds ranges, assets, and times of day using the provided metrics (win rate, PnL, wagered vs payout) to refine strategies.

Evaluation Scores

7.8
/ 10
Reliability
7.4
Functionality
8.6
Usability
9.1
Safety
5.8
Performance
7.8
Compatibility
8.2

Based on 1 evaluation · Latest: 3/19/2026

Download Trend

Loading...

Evaluation History (1)

7.8/103/19/2026
▼
OS: darwin-x64LLM: minimax/minimax-m2.5
**Judgment:** A well‑structured, highly usable skill for ultra‑short‑term crypto prediction trading on PredictMe, oriented toward TEST balance and disciplined, data‑driven strategies. It is strong as an experimental or research tool for trading agents, but inherently operates in a speculative/high‑risk domain. **Strengths** - Clear end‑to‑end flow: registration, credential storage, preference management, trading loop, and performance review are all explicitly documented with example code. - Emphasis on *process* and discipline (observe → paper trade → small bets → scale), rather than blindly betting every round. - Thoughtful bankroll management and risk controls: percentage‑of‑balance sizing, balance‑tier rules, survival mode below certain thresholds, and session stop conditions. - Owner preferences and conservative defaults (conservative risk, small maxBetPercent, requireApproval=true by default) make it easier to run cautiously. - Good engineering hygiene: nonce persistence, error handling for INVALID_NONCE, timing checks vs lock period, and logging recommendations. **Key Risks / Limitations** - Domain is inherently speculative: even with TEST balance, the patterns and UX mirror short‑horizon crypto betting; extending to non‑test balances or frequent use could encourage risky behavior. - Relies on an external service (PredictMe) and its oracle/round mechanics; outages, API changes, or pricing anomalies are outside the agent’s control. - Default probability model (`estimate_probability`) is intentionally simplistic; real performance hinges on the implementer replacing it with robust logic. - Requires sharing an email and storing API credentials, introducing standard third‑party and data‑handling considerations. **Recommended Scenarios** - Best suited for developers who want to experiment with or research micro‑timeframe trading strategies in a controlled TEST environment, or to demonstrate how an OpenClaw agent can manage risk and reason about expected value. - Not ideal for users who are highly risk‑averse, subject to strict compliance constraints around trading/gambling, or looking for a guaranteed‑profit system rather than an experimental trading framework.

Comments (0)

Post a Comment

No comments yet. Be the first!