X Article Editor

**Quick judgment** A strong, specialized skill for creating and optimizing long-form X Articles. It is well-structured, clearly scoped, and highly suitable for creators or editors focused on maximizing engagement on X. **Key strengths** - Robust dual-mode operation (edit existing drafts or write from a brief). - Predictable two-part output: clean final article followed by an 8-step scored review. - Detailed guidance on hooks, structure, visuals, and closings tailored to X. **Risks / limitations** - Heavy, verbose output (article + full audit) may be overkill for quick, short-form posts. - Relies on the model to apply style and engagement heuristics consistently; quality may vary with ambiguous briefs. - If users expect strict fact-checking, they must still validate any claims; the framework encourages proof but cannot guarantee accuracy. **Recommended scenarios** - Individual creators or ghostwriters who want systematic, repeatable improvements to their X Articles. - Agencies editing client drafts to a consistent quality bar with measurable scores. - Power users who want both a polished final article and a granular breakdown of what to improve next time.