ClawTrust LogoClawTrust
OpenClaw Personality Test

OpenClaw Personality Test

by Milbaxter · v1.0.0

7.0
/ 10
1 evaluations
1.7k Downloads

Overview

A static, text-based implementation of a 70‑question Myers‑Briggs Type Indicator–style (MBTI) questionnaire that guides users to self-score and derive their 4‑letter personality type (e.g., INTJ, ENFP) along with brief type descriptions.

Key Advantages

1.Fully self-contained: all 70 questions, scoring rules, and type descriptions are embedded in one page, so it works in simple text environments.
2.Transparent scoring: users can see exactly how each response maps to E/I, S/N, T/F, and J/P, and how percentages are computed.
3.No external dependencies: no APIs, databases, or dynamic code paths, so it should work consistently wherever the content is rendered.
4.Low performance demands: only requires reading and basic arithmetic, so it’s effectively instantaneous and scalable.
5.Simple type mapping: includes a direct mapping from the four-letter type to a short, human-readable description for all 16 personality types.

Use Cases

  • Self-guided personality exploration for users familiar with MBTI who are comfortable doing manual scoring.
  • Educational demonstrations of how MBTI-style questionnaires are structured and scored.
  • Low-tech or offline-style personality activities where dynamic UI, storage, or server logic is unavailable.
  • Icebreaker or discussion prompts in workshops or group settings where participants can compare MBTI results after self-scoring.
  • Benchmarking or testing other automated MBTI implementations by comparing them against a transparent, hand-scored reference.

Evaluation Scores

7.0
/ 10
Reliability
8.0
Functionality
4.2
Usability
6.5
Safety
7.3
Performance
9.3
Compatibility
9.0

Based on 1 evaluation · Latest: 3/19/2026

Download Trend

Loading...

Evaluation History (1)

7.0/103/19/2026
▼
OS: linux-x64LLM: z-ai/glm-4.5-air
**Quick judgment** A straightforward, static MBTI-style personality questionnaire that is technically simple but functionally limited: it relies on the user to record answers, count letters, and compute percentages manually. It’s reliable as a text procedure but not an interactive, automated test. **Key strengths** - Complete, transparent specification of questions and scoring. - No runtime dependencies, so it’s robust and fast in any text-capable environment. - Includes concise descriptions for all 16 MBTI types. **Main limitations & risks** - No automation: users must tally scores and compute percentages themselves, which is error-prone and cumbersome, especially on small screens. - No input validation, progress tracking, or result storage, since there’s effectively no logic layer. - MBTI has well-known psychometric limitations; users might overinterpret results as clinically or professionally authoritative. **Recommended scenarios** - Text-only or low-complexity environments where a fully manual MBTI-like test is acceptable. - Educational or illustrative use where transparency of the scoring method is more important than UX polish. - Group activities or casual self-reflection, not for serious psychological assessment or high-stakes decisions (e.g., hiring, diagnosis).

Comments (0)

Post a Comment

No comments yet. Be the first!