3.9k Downloads
Overview
Search, retrieve, and analyze academic papers from arXiv.org, with optional reading-list management for ongoing research workflows.
Key Advantages
1.Direct integration with arXiv API (no API key required), enabling live search and up-to-date paper retrieval.
2.End-to-end workflow support: search, get metadata, download PDFs, and summarize papers in one place.
3.Reading-list features (save, list, mark-as-read) to manage ongoing literature review and tracking.
4.Optimized for AI/ML and security topics (e.g., LLM attacks, prompt injection, red teaming), but applicable to any arXiv domain.
5.Clear natural-language commands with concrete usage examples, making it easy to adopt for non-experts.
Use Cases
- Running focused literature reviews on specific technical topics (e.g., LLM security, transformer architectures).
- Staying current with the latest arXiv submissions in AI/ML, security, and other fast-moving fields.
- Preparing for technical interviews by reviewing recent research papers relevant to the target role or domain.
- Supporting content creation (blogs, LinkedIn posts, newsletters) with authoritative citations and summaries from arXiv.
- Maintaining a personal reading backlog with saved papers and read/unread status across research projects.
Evaluation Scores
8.0
/ 10
Reliability
7.5
Functionality
8.0
Usability
8.5
Safety
7.0
Performance
8.5
Compatibility
9.0
Based on 1 evaluation · Latest: 3/19/2026
Download Trend
Loading...
Evaluation History (1)
8.0/103/19/2026▼
OS: darwin-x64LLM: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5
**Judgment:** A strong, focused skill for arXiv-centric research workflows, especially valuable for AI/ML and security researchers who frequently work with preprints. It covers the core loop—search, inspect, download, and summarize—plus a basic reading list, making it a good fit as a default arXiv tool in a technical research stack.
**Key strengths:**
- No API key needed; leverages the public arXiv API for live, up-to-date results.
- Supports concrete research tasks: topic-based search, paper lookup by ID/URL, PDF download, and summarization.
- Reading-list management (save/show/mark-as-read) helps structure ongoing literature reviews.
- Clear example prompts and workflows make it easy to integrate into day-to-day research and content creation.
**Risks & limitations:**
- **Content risk:** Can surface dual-use or sensitive technical content (e.g., AI security, cyber, potentially bio-related work). The calling assistant must still apply its own safety policies when interpreting or transforming paper content.
- **Reliance on external services:** Functionality depends on arXiv’s API availability and, for tracking, an external MongoDB instance—these can introduce outages or latency outside the skill’s control.
- **Scope limitations:** Focused on arXiv only—no integration with other publishers, citation networks, or advanced bibliometrics beyond what arXiv or secondary sources provide.
- **Quality & hallucinations:** The skill fetches genuine arXiv data, but any AI-driven summarization or interpretation on top can still misrepresent nuances or miss key caveats; users should verify critical claims in the original PDF.
**Recommended scenarios:**
- Daily use by AI/ML researchers to scan and triage new arXiv submissions in their niche.
- Students or practitioners doing structured literature reviews, where a reading list plus quick summaries are especially valuable.
- Security and alignment teams monitoring areas like LLM jailbreaking, prompt injection, and red teaming.
- Technical content creators looking for credible, citable sources to anchor posts, talks, or newsletters.
Overall, this is a well-scoped, practical tool for any workflow where arXiv is a primary information source, provided the calling assistant layers appropriate safety checks and encourages users to consult the original papers for critical decisions.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!