8.4
/ 10
1 evaluations
4k Downloads
Overview
Provide contextual follow‑up question suggestions (Quick, Deep Dive, Related) after any AI response when the user triggers /followups or equivalent phrases.
Key Advantages
1.Improves conversation flow by suggesting relevant next questions without the user needing to think of them.
2.Uses existing OpenClaw auth/model context, so configuration is minimal and consistent with the current chat setup.
3.Supports multiple channels with appropriate UI (buttons on rich platforms, numeric replies on text-only channels).
4.Simple, explicit trigger via slash command plus natural-language triggers like “followups” or “what should I ask next?”.
5.Configurable provider and model override, allowing use with OpenClaw, OpenRouter, or Anthropic backends.
Use Cases
- General Q&A sessions where users aren’t sure what to ask next after an answer.
- Technical support or learning scenarios (e.g., programming, DevOps) where deeper or related exploration paths are helpful.
- Onboarding and education flows where guided exploration improves user retention and understanding.
- Product discovery or feature explanation chats where you want to surface logical “next step” questions automatically.
- Customer service bots that benefit from structured follow-ups (clarification, deeper detail, related options).
Evaluation Scores
8.4
/ 10
Reliability
7.5
Functionality
8.5
Usability
9.0
Safety
8.3
Performance
8.0
Compatibility
9.0
Based on 1 evaluation · Latest: 3/19/2026
Download Trend
Loading...
Evaluation History (1)
8.4/103/19/2026▼
OS: darwin-x64LLM: stepfun/step-3.5-flash
**Judgment:** A focused, well-scoped utility skill that meaningfully improves chat UX by offering contextual follow-up questions. It’s especially useful in educational, exploratory, and support contexts where users may not know what to ask next.
**What it does well**
- Adds a consistent `/followups` (plus aliases/natural language) mechanism to surface three follow-up suggestions: **Quick**, **Deep Dive**, and **Related**.
- Uses the existing conversation context and current model/auth, so it feels native to the chat and requires minimal setup.
- Channel-aware interaction (buttons vs numeric replies) makes it broadly deployable across Telegram/Discord/Slack and SMS-like channels.
**Key risks / limitations**
- Safety is entirely inherited from the underlying model and policy; suggested questions may sometimes steer into sensitive or unwanted topics if the base model would do so.
- No explicit controls mentioned for customizing or constraining the types of follow-ups (e.g., domain restrictions, compliance filters).
- Reliability details (error handling, behavior on long/complex conversation histories, rate limits) aren’t documented, so operational robustness isn’t guaranteed.
**Recommended scenarios**
- **Learning & onboarding:** Tutoring, technical education, or product training chats where structured exploration is valuable.
- **Developer & power-user chats:** Technical support, DevOps, and programming assistants where “Deep Dive” and “Related” questions help uncover relevant details.
- **General-purpose assistants:** Any assistant where you want lightweight, low-friction guidance for “what to ask next” without redesigning the core bot logic.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!