academic-writing

## Quick Evaluation This skill is well-designed for rigorous academic writing: it enforces formal tone, Markdown-only output, structured sections, and a clear, numbered citation system using legitimate academic sources. It is particularly strong when used for papers, theses, and literature reviews where conventional scholarly standards are required. ## Recommended Scenarios - Writing or refining journal articles, theses, dissertations, and coursework essays. - Producing literature reviews and methodology sections with clear structure and academic language. - Generating tables and Mermaid diagrams to organize and visualize scholarly content. - Workflows where downstream tools expect Markdown and can leverage the `<ama-doc>...</ama-doc>` wrapper. ## Key Risks & Limitations - **Citation reliability risk**: Although it forbids fabricated references, large language models can still hallucinate sources; users must manually verify all citations and references. - **Source-type restrictions**: Only academic sources are allowed, which limits suitability for tasks requiring news, blogs, policy briefs, or grey literature. - **Format rigidity**: Forced Markdown and required `<ama-doc>` tags may conflict with systems expecting plain text or custom formats. - **Academic integrity concerns**: While it emphasizes not fabricating data, it does not explicitly address plagiarism or appropriate assistance boundaries, so institutions should provide their own usage guidelines. Overall, this skill is a good fit for structured, citation-heavy academic writing workflows, provided users validate references and are comfortable with the Markdown + tag conventions.